![year difference between portal and portal 2 year difference between portal and portal 2](https://steamah.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Living-room-home-wall-decoration-fabric-poster-Portal-Portal-2-Valve-Portal-Gun-GLaDOS-Chell-video-1.jpg)
This highlights the importance of identifying the opinions of many stakeholders during patient portal implementation.
![year difference between portal and portal 2 year difference between portal and portal 2](https://cdn.tgdd.vn/GameApp/4/249295/Screentshots/portal-2--game-nhap-vai-di-tim-an-so-danh-cho-pc-22-08-2021-1.jpg)
However, previous research mainly focused on perceptions of single stakeholder groups regarding patient portal implementation, such as physicians or nurses. McGinn et al argue that the consideration of various stakeholder opinions can contribute to successful implementations.
#Year difference between portal and portal 2 professional#
The comprehensive model of Grol and Wensing summarizes the barriers to and facilitators of change in health care practice at 6 levels: (1) innovation (2) individual professional (3) patient (4) social context (5) organizational context and (6) economic and political context. Another example is the “Fit between Individuals, Tasks, and Technology” (FITT) framework, which is aimed at the adoption of IT. In this model, patients are part of the “outer setting,” suggesting that the CFIR framework is aimed primarily at institutions. CFIR consists of 5 levels at which barriers and facilitators can occur during implementation: (1) technology-related factors (eg, “adaptability,” “complexity,” and “cost”) (2) outer setting (eg, “policy and incentives”) (3) inner setting (eg, “resources”) (4) process (eg, “engagement of stakeholders”) and (5) individual health professionals (eg, “individual’s knowledge”). Several implementation models are available, such as “The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR),” which is used in many studies as a guiding framework. This can be affected by multiple factors at the micro (eg, “individuals”), meso (eg, “resources”), and macro (eg, “sociopolitical context”) levels. Īlthough patient portals can have positive effects and may develop into a standard element of care, their implementation has major impacts on health care institutions as it often involves a complex change in an organization.
![year difference between portal and portal 2 year difference between portal and portal 2](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81CAN23ULhL._SL1500_.jpg)
In summary, patient portals can be important as they provide patients with access to their own medical information, enable interaction with their health care professionals, and aim to involve patients in their own care processes. On the other hand, effects on health outcomes are reported to be mixed. Patient empowerment can also be improved the accessibility of information can especially contribute to “patients’ knowledge” and their “perception of autonomy and being respected”. Portal use can also have a positive effect on self-management of conditions, communication between patients and providers, quality of care and participation in treatment. Previous research showed that patients are especially satisfied with access to information from the EHR and the list of their appointments. Patient portals may have a range of functionalities that enable information exchange (such as having access to the EHR), which in turn may facilitate and improve the communication between the patient and the health care professional. Some institutions allow patient portals to facilitate communication between patients and health care professionals, view their appointments and provide patient education, share information, request for repeat medication prescriptions, and provide tailored feedback. These portals are often connected to the electronic health record (EHR) of an institution-defined as tethered patient portals -to provide access to patients’ medical information. Patient portals can be defined as “applications which are designed to give the patient secure access to health information and allow secure methods for communication and information sharing”, as well as for administrative purposes, and are mostly provided by a single health care institution. In health care, an increasingly popular way to facilitate this is by using patient portals. Information technology (IT) can play an important role in improving access to this information, and it also improves the participation of patients in their own care. According to the Institute of Medicine, “patients should have unfettered access to their own medical information” to support them in taking control of their health (eg, using medical information to make informed health-related decisions). Patient-centeredness is an important element of high-quality care: effective communication between patients and their health care professionals, and information access can both contribute considerably to this.